Sign Up
  • Earth.Org Newsletters

    Sign up to our weekly and monthly, easy-to-digest recap of climate news from around the world.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Earth.Org PAST · PRESENT · FUTURE
Environmental News, Data Analysis, Research & Policy Solutions. Read Our Mission Statement

Health, Environmental Groups Sue US EPA Over Rollback of Mercury Standards for Power Plants

by Martina Igini Americas Mar 31st 20263 mins
Health, Environmental Groups Sue US EPA Over Rollback of Mercury Standards for Power Plants

The lawsuit challenges the Trump administration’s recent repeal of the Biden-era amendments to the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards for power plants, which effectively allows coal-fired power plants to emit more brain-damaging mercury and other harmful heavy metals such as nickel, arsenic, and lead.

A coalition of US-based health and environmental groups is taking the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to court over its recent repeal of standards that limit brain-damaging mercury, lead, and other hazardous air pollution from coal-fired power plants.

The coalition, which includes ​Earthjustice, the American Lung Association, the Natural Resources Defense Council, the American Academy of Pediatrics, ​and the Environmental Law and Policy Center, filed the lawsuit ⁠in the US Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit on Monday. The suit addresses the EPA’s repeal of the Biden-era amendments to the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS), which was finalized in February. The repeal effectively allows coal-fired power plants to emit more brain-damaging mercury and other harmful heavy metals such as nickel, arsenic, and lead.

The lawsuit also challenges the repeal of a requirement for power plants to have systems in place to monitor the amount of pollution they emit in accordance with air pollution standards.

The standards, first issued in 2012 by the Obama administration, were strengthened and updated by the Biden administration in April 2024 to reflect the latest advancements in pollution control technologies. Since 2015, the deadline for their implementation, the standards have delivered a 90% reduction in mercury emissions from power plants over pre-standard levels and other health benefits, including lowered risk of cancer, heart and lung disease, and premature death. According to EPA figures cited in the coalition’s press release announcing the lawsuit, 93% of US coal capacity had already met or were on track to meet those standards by last year.

Mercury and the other heavy metals targeted by the regulation are highly toxic and dangerous to human health, capable of causing severe damage to the nervous, digestive, and immune systems, as well as the lungs and kidneys. They are also responsible for extensive environmental damage, poisoning fish and wildlife as they deposit in soil and water.

The Sherburne County Generating Station, a large coal-fired power plant on the banks of the Mississippi River in Becker, Minnesota.
The Sherburne County Generating Station, a large coal-fired power plant on the banks of the Mississippi River in Becker, Minnesota. Photo: Tony Webster via Wikimedia Commons.

In the press release, the coalition called the move “illegal” and said that the absence of standards would lead to “more asthma attacks, emergency room visits, and premature deaths.”

“This administration is not just rolling back rules, it is eliminating the monitoring infrastructure needed to know what is coming out of these smokestacks in the first place. It is allowing coal plants to spew out more neurotoxic mercury into our air and food supply, while simultaneously keeping the communities most at risk in the dark about how serious that threat is. This is a betrayal of the EPA’s core mission,” the press release read.

You might also like: ‘He Has Betrayed the Agency’: More than 160 Climate, Health Groups Call For Firing of EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin

Featured image: Wikimedia Commons.

About the Author

Martina Igini

Martina is a journalist and editor with experience covering climate change, extreme weather, climate policy and litigation. At Earth.Org, she singlehandedly manages over 100 global contributing writers and oversees the publication's editorial calendar. She also curates the news section and multiple newsletters. Since joining the newsroom in 2022, she's successfully grown the monthly audience from 600,000 to more than one million. Before moving to Asia, she worked in Vienna at the United Nations Global Communication Department and in Italy as a local news reporter. She holds two BA degrees - in Translation Studies and Journalism - and an MA in International Development from the University of Vienna.

martina.igini@earth.org
Subscribe to our newsletters

The best environmental stories of the week and month, handpicked by our Editor. Make sure you're on top of what's new in the climate.

SUBSCRIBE
Instagram @earthorg Follow Us